In Part 1, I described the first draft.
In Part 2, I described the revision process.
In Part 3, I described incorporating reader feedback and submission to Writers of the Future.
And now, in Part 4, I’ll give you some insight as to what happens next.
Last week, I received my rejection from Writers of the Future. And I say rejection, because I did not win any of the prizes this quarter. My story was awarded an Honorable Mention, and of course I’m happy with that. As I should be. I should not be content with it, though. I am still entering this contest because I still qualify for it, until the time when I have made enough qualifying sales to other markets. So, I keep going.
Now, I need to decide what to do with this story next. Obviously I’d like to get paid for it. There are two main options for that:
1) Self-publish on Amazon, as either a stand-alone story or part of a collection; or,
2) Submit to paying markets until one accepts and pays me for publication.
At this time I plan to pursue option (2), because I still want the connection and notoriety that comes with publication in F&SF, Clarkesworld, Asimov’s, etc. They don’t give Hugo awards to self-publishers, after all. You’ve got to be part of the in-crowd for something like that, so I go door-to-door in the in-crowd neighborhood, hawking my wares, patiently accepting their rejections, and moving on to the next.
The following are 15 markets that this story would qualify for, in terms of what kind of story they usually publish, length they accept, and whether or not they’re even open for submissions right now:
- New Myths
- Beneath Ceaseless Skies
- Abyss & Apex
- Fantasy & Science Fiction
- Orson Scott Card’s Intergalactic Medicine Show
- Strange Horizons
- Leading Edge
- T Gene Davis’ Speculative Blog
- Outposts of Beyond
I’ve submitted to Clarkesworld. This is run by Neal Clarke, and he’s very quick on the turnaround. I should have an answer in 3 days or less. When the rejection from that comes in, I’ll go down the list. Or, if there’s an impending deadline for submissions, I’ll advance that listing in the hierarchy. If I didn’t realize it and market is closed when I get to it, I go to the next one. This happens often.
So, we’re in the thick of it now! Cross your fingers – there might be an acceptance in the works, sometime in the next couple of years. Yes, it sometimes really does take that long. I’ve got one story I’ve submitted 15 times since 2015, and it’s still getting rejections. But I like it, and I’d like more people to read it, so I keep submitting. I’ve heard anecdotes of authors selling stories on the 40th submission or later. I don’t know if I have that determination. Or is it foolishness? It’s up to me to eventually decide to pull a story from the rotation and just keep it to myself. Until then, we press on.
3 thoughts on “Composing a story, part 4 of ??”
Congrats and bummer on your honorable mention. Did you get any feedback from the judges? Do you tend to tweak your stories before resubmitting, or do you go with the thought process that the story in general wasn’t the right fit for that publisher?
I haven’t gotten any feedback from these judges. I don’t think they generally give it for Honorable Mention, just those that get a little farther along in the process. I usually won’t do any more tweaking, just let it ride now. I haven’t often been one to do a lot of major revision, either, but after my writing conference I learned how to do some. This story has more revision than usual, but not the most. Another story, “Slave to the Motherboard”, has the most of any I’ve ever done. That one is still making the submission rounds as well. Usually, it’s more of the second mindset: “just not right for that publisher / market”. And that’s often what the writing advice is from those who know.